The new frontlines in the statutory interpretation battles are the states. And the most interesting part is that, in at least some states, the battles don\u27t seem to be battles at all. Whereas on the federal side, the now-stale fight between textualist and purposivist statutory interpreters continues to repeat, some state courts seem to be engaged in an entirely different and more productive set of conversations about interpretive predictability - conversations that are relevant not only to the states having them, but to federal interpreters as well
Interpretive methodology lies at the core of the Supreme Court\u27s persistent modern debate about s...
This Article seeks to mitigate decades of confusion about the Erie doctrine’s purposes, justificatio...
It is hard to find consensus on questions of statutory interpretation. Debates rage on about the app...
The Erie doctrine requires federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction to apply state substan...
We do not have an Erie for the Age of Statutes. The Erie that we have addresses a world in which t...
This Article offers the first close study of statutory interpretation in several state courts of las...
This article traces the problems encountered in interpreting statutes to twenty-nine distinct proble...
Should courts interpret the Constitution as they interpret statutes? This question has been answered...
This Article addresses a problem that potentially arises whenever a federal court encounters a state...
Finding methodological consensus for statutory interpretation cases is all the rage these days.1 Som...
This Article examines the methods of statutory interpretation used by the lower federal courts, espe...
This Article examines the methods of statutory interpretation used by the lower federal courts, espe...
How should courts interpret statutes? This question has fueled generations of debate. Some believe g...
In the past decade the study of statutory interpretation has gone from benign neglect to intense scr...
State courts often encounter the statutes of other states. Any encounter with another state’s statut...
Interpretive methodology lies at the core of the Supreme Court\u27s persistent modern debate about s...
This Article seeks to mitigate decades of confusion about the Erie doctrine’s purposes, justificatio...
It is hard to find consensus on questions of statutory interpretation. Debates rage on about the app...
The Erie doctrine requires federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction to apply state substan...
We do not have an Erie for the Age of Statutes. The Erie that we have addresses a world in which t...
This Article offers the first close study of statutory interpretation in several state courts of las...
This article traces the problems encountered in interpreting statutes to twenty-nine distinct proble...
Should courts interpret the Constitution as they interpret statutes? This question has been answered...
This Article addresses a problem that potentially arises whenever a federal court encounters a state...
Finding methodological consensus for statutory interpretation cases is all the rage these days.1 Som...
This Article examines the methods of statutory interpretation used by the lower federal courts, espe...
This Article examines the methods of statutory interpretation used by the lower federal courts, espe...
How should courts interpret statutes? This question has fueled generations of debate. Some believe g...
In the past decade the study of statutory interpretation has gone from benign neglect to intense scr...
State courts often encounter the statutes of other states. Any encounter with another state’s statut...
Interpretive methodology lies at the core of the Supreme Court\u27s persistent modern debate about s...
This Article seeks to mitigate decades of confusion about the Erie doctrine’s purposes, justificatio...
It is hard to find consensus on questions of statutory interpretation. Debates rage on about the app...